Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Donn Harper Jr.'s avatar

Sympathies.

I haven't self published my novels yet...

I have over 300 subscribers, yet, only three or four readers actually.

I only get comments from the same few. For some reason those comments have all been positive.

I released Two albums of music and four separate singles.

Lots of compliments, only two purchases.

I have been told it's down to lack of marketing.

Then I look at my subscriber list.

Fewer than a third apparently bother to open the emails.

Far less read,

Far less care enough to comment.

( Those that do, I can't thank you enough !!!)

Why subscribe if they aren't interested?

My only conclusion is,

My work really doesn't appeal to most.

And it's not engaging enough to criticize.

Without feedback, how do I know what needs to improve?

What do folks like? Dislike?

Am I merely beating my head against a wall?

I guess it doesn't matter.

I have to write or the stuff claws it's way out and that makes a gnarly mess.

Same with my music.

Indifference hurts far worse than criticism doesn't it?

All I can say.

Keep writing.

Else, if you're like me you will explode.

Expand full comment
Jenean McBrearty's avatar

Hi. I am a follower because I can't afford upgrade to paid. I understand your plight; I have a few niches but niches are small. My personality is an acquired taste. My target audience is women with working brains. I have a distinctive sense of humor, and I'm a bigoistiphobe, freedom of speech kind'a gal. I've also self-published because no big publishing house would ever risk offending anyone. Here's what I've learned:

1. Most people are Biden-broke. With the holidays approaching you would think people would jump at books-as-gifts, but the truth is most people don't read novels. I've got over 265 published works (half of them paid gigs) in print, e-zines, anthologies and journals, so I thought I'd get an Amazon account (for my 6 novels, 4 novellas, and a trio of novelettes) and see what happens. No cigar. The anthologies I'm published in get good reviews for my stories, but endorsements from famous people? Nope.

2. There are more writers than readers. And most writers have real lives and have to sneak in time to write, especially women. That means that if they're reading other people's stuff, they're not writing their stuff. What that means in the market is saturated. It's difficult to compete with 100 Americans vying for book sales; it's almost impossible with the internet to compete with billions of writers around the globe. (Don't forget, crap, like cream, rises to the top also.)

3. Most readers read the same story with different covers. The media dishes out the "new thing" and the audience becomes addicted. How many "walking dead" can there possibly be? How many Harry Potters? Too many, it seems. On the other hand, I read non-fiction/history for pleasure, not novels. How many women have read Killing the SS, Killing the Rising Sun, etc all by Bill O'Reilly and all packed with minute historical detail compared to the women who have read vampire/love Twilight series? Here's the response I got from a friend when I sent her the podcast of my poems: I listened to them, but didn't understand them. David (her husband) loved them.

4. Most self-publishers don't have the money to do a real marketing campaign. Web platforms simply do not get enough foot traffic to get the volume required to make money. And, when the reality is your selling yourself (YOU are the product), there's no room for the actual product. Do you have the time/money to fly to five cities for a book signing? How are people going to meet and greet you?

5. America has laws against pirating, other countries don't respect our copyright laws. There is a firm in Italy that is selling my IP all over Europe and there's nothing I can do. I've reported the firm and relevant information to the government website for international violation of copyright and have an e-mail acknowledging the complaint, but nothing will be done because I'm not famous and can't afford lawyers to sue.

6. As usual, no matter what the professionals say, it's who you know and who you blow that gets you published. Everybody talks about how J K Rowling wrote such a ground-breaking book series...except she didn't write what the public read. The agent that picked up her handwritten manuscript "edited" the hell out of it so it could be published. In other words, the agent thought it could go commercial and fixed it so it could. Yes, Rowling had a great idea --- I'm not dissing her. But the truth is, she was not a Grade A professional when she hit it big. Yes, Stephen King wrote mediocre long-winded horror stories, but it was Hollywood that made hm famous.

I could be wrong about all of this, but I don't believe I am. Does this mean people should give up writing? Some will, of course. Others, like MFA professors, will fade away with their programs when AI kicks into high gear. I hope people who are not looking to cash in on their talent to finance their kids' college expenses will keep writing. Creative writing, like any other art, helps us to become fuller human beings. (Not the rabid woke crazies who want to save the world, of course, as they're lost to reason and just hopeless ranter and ravers.) And like the old saying goes: people give up right before they're going to be a success. Don't do that, please. You maybe a publishers next dream come true. Maybe you'll be Bowling with Rowling this time next year. I'm rooting for you!

Expand full comment
79 more comments...

No posts